Firefly 2 vs Arizer Solo 2 – Flavor Fight
Firefly 2 vs Arizer Solo 2
|
Manufacturing QualityI originally found the Firefly 2 to be a huge let down when it came to the manufacturing quality. My initial impressions were that the battery life was horrendous and that there should have been temperature control without the app. These impressions havent changed, but Ive also begun to appreciate other features more. For example, I think the pin sensor things on the sides that are used to activate the heater are a cool touch. You can literally pick this up, take a draw, and set it back down. You dont have to press any buttons, set temperatures, or wait for it to heat up. Considering how most vaporizers work, thats pretty innovative. Even though the Firefly 2 is growing on me, the Solo 2 still blows it away in this category. Im not sure where I should even start. I obviously like that Arizer added a screen for full temperature control, but I think the most impressive feature is the battery. It offers 3 hours of use on a single charge. There isnt a single other vaporizer out there that can beat that. The Solo 2 is also very solid, and I would expect it to be the longer lasting of these two. The original Solo is one of the most dependable vaporizers ever built, and the Solo 2 seems to be packed with only improvements. |
Ease of UseThere are two ways to look at the Firefly 2. On one hand, you cant get easier to use. Everyone, including me, has always said that you cant get easier than a one button vape. This doesnt even have a button! Like I said before, you just pick it up, put your fingers on the sensors, and take a draw. When it comes to taking a draw, you cant get easier. On the other hand, people find it very hard to make it work right. Getting a good amount of vapor requires a different type of draw than you would use with most vaporizers. You also have to use an app to change any of the settings, which can be cumbersome. The short battery life is also inconvenient. In these ways, it isnt all that easy to use. The Solo 2 is more typical. It doesnt have strong pros or cons in either direction. There are a few buttons so you can turn it on and adjust the temperature, and there is no trick to getting good vapor. Anyone could easily figure out how to use this. Id say this is a tie overall. Depending on how you vape, you may find one or the other much more convenient. |
PortabilityThe Firefly 2 should be the easy winner here. The Solo 2s glass stem is a little inconvenient when you are carrying it around for two reasons. For one, its just an extra part you have to carry. Its also something that could easily break. Im not so sure that the Firefly 2 is more portable though. Like I mentioned before, its battery life is horrendous. People say that they like that Firefly chose to include 2 batteries in the box, but they didnt really have an option. The fact that the Solo 2 has a 3 hour battery life evens the playing field enough that I wouldnt call either of these a winner. |
Battery LifeIve already discussed this a lot, the Solo 2 destroys the Firefly 2 in battery life. It can last up to 3 hours, which is longer than any other vaporizer on the market. Consider this: If you were to fully charge both batteries for the Firefly 2 and fully use them, you still would only have half the battery life of the Solo 2. No contest. |
DiscreetnessThis is a category where the Firefly 2 does do well. Even though you hold it like a pipe, its very discreet because of how quickly you can take a draw. This allows you to take advantage of a 10 second window and get a good draw of vapor before putting it away again thanks to the on demand heating. You cant really appreciate how great this is until you are out in public and want to take a single quick draw. The Solo 2s glass stems really hold it back from being very discreet. This is why most people consider it an at home portable. |
Temperature FlexibilityThe Solo 2 wins this category easily. Updates to the Firefly 2 allow you to adjust the temperature settings to specific levels, but you still have to use the app. The Solo 2 allows you to pick and exact temperature from the device itself, which is much more convenient. |
SHOWDOWNThe Solo 2 is our clear winner! While both of these are at the top of their game in terms of vapor production, I think the Solo 2 offers the better overall experience. The temperature control is great thanks to the screen, but the battery life is where the Solo 2 really distinguishes itself. 3 hours isnt just above average, its double the average of 1.5 hours. Meanwhile the Firefly 2 barely reaches 1.5 hours off two batteries. While I think the Solo 2 is better overall, there are also good reasons for buying the Firefly 2. The flavor is outstanding, and the on demand heating offers several benefits which I discussed above. Also one thing we did not touch on here but mentioned in our Firefly 2 review is the fact that the Firefly 2 is an extremely capable wax device, in fact we ranked it number 1 for our Wax Device Ranking Chart. If these excite you, go for the Firefly 2. If you cant decide, go with the Solo 2. Alternatively the Firefly 2+ vaporizer has been available for awhile now and its definitley worth checking out. If youd like to see another comparison, check out our recent showdown between the Zeus Arc & Arizer Solo 2 and to see how these 2 units stack up against the field, be sure to check out our Portable Vaporizer Ranking Chart. |